Some Facts about Varg Vikernes & his Case

BulgarianFrench. MagyarSerbian.

These facts about Vikernes and his case are published here to counter the lies of the many media institutions.

-Born in Bergen 1973 as Kristian Vikernes. Is not baptized.

-Changed name officially to Varg Vikernes in March 1993.

-Has never had either of the middle names Larsson, Larssøn, Kvisling or Quisling as claimed by many media institutions.

-Is not a “self-declared Neo-Nazi” as claimed by many media institutions. Vikernes is an Óðalist

-Stopped playing so-called ‘black metal’ in early 1993. Has recorded three bardic metal albums since then, but is no longer even a metal musician. Vikernes plays electronic music

-Convicted in 1994 for first degree murder, but claims himself that he killed in self defence (in August 1993), and explained himself in complete accordance with all technical evidence. Aarseth was killed because he panicked and attacked Vikernes when Vikernes approached him to tell him to stay away from him. According to many witnesses, Øystein Aarseth had plans to knock out Varg Vikernes with a stun gun, tie him up, put him in the trunk of a car, drive him into the forest, tie him to a tree and torture him to death, whilst filming it. Vikernes knew about these plans as Aarseth told about them on the phone to a friend of his, who let Vikernes listen to it all. The ‘Norwegian’ court (and the media…) still claimed that “Varg Vikernes had no clear or understandable motive for killing Øystein Aarseth”. All of Aarseth’s friends of course knew better, as proven by this letter (from Anders Odden). 

-Øystein Aarseth was not a “band collegue” of Vikernes, but an acquaintance and a business associate: Aarseth owned the label that released the first album of Vikernes’ band, Burzum. The relation Vikernes had with Aarseth’s band, Mayhem, was that he helped as a studio musician in 1992 by recording the bass track on one of their albums, and was for a brief period a member of the band. Vikernes had not been a member of that band for more than half a year when Aarseth was killed.

-Convicted in 1994 for having set fire to 4 churches, solely because one single witness for each case (and 2 in one of the cases) gave false testimony against him in court. The witnesses were ‘big surprise’ all friends of Øystein Aarseth, some of them outspoken enemies of Vikernes, and they were also the ones who actually set fire to these churches (they too were convicted for this, but were given more leninent treatment because of their false testimonies against Vikernes). One of these witnesses (Bård G. Eithun) admitted in 1998, under oath in a court of law, that he had given false testimony against Varg Vikernes, and that he had done so because the Norwegian police had asked him to do so (“to get back at Vikernes for killing Aarseth” and to get a more lenient treatment himself, when going to court for his own crimes).

-Varg Vikernes was also found not guilty of having set fire to Fantoft stave church. I stress this, because there seems to be a general understanding that Vikernes set fire to the Fantoft stave church.

-Was in 1994 defended by a lawyer who according to medical examinations was 100% unfit for work during the whole process. Vikernes was given no opportunity to test his guilt again, in a court of law. He was not allowed to appeal to a higher court, save in relation to the length of the sentence.

-Vikernes stated clearly in all contexts where he was allowed to express himself that he was a nationalist and an Odinist (his preferred term for Pagan at the time), but was consequently presented as a “devil worshiper” or a “satanist” by the media. Not one single media institution in Norway diverged from this practice until 1995, when Dagbladet finally admitted that Vikernes was not a Satanist.

-Went through meticulous psychiatric examinations in 2002, concluding that Vikernes is not a psychopath and has no indications of psychopathy (“personality disorders”) or any other mental illnesses or deficiencies either.

-Was in 2003 convicted to 14 months in prison, after having not returned from a leave, for having hi-jacked a car during an escape from armed men in the Norwegian mountains. The Norwegian police claimed never to have been there, and the judge wrote in the verdict that Vikernes had encountered hunters with ski-masks, automatic rifles and German shepherd dogs, who blocked the only escape route Vikernes had from his cabin by parking a huge SUV sideways in the middle of the road. The SUV was by chance (according to Norwegian former FSK soldiers Vikernes has spoken to) identical to the one(s) used by FSK, the Norwegian Special Forces, a military unit with police authority (…). Vikernes drove his hijacked car to Oslo, in order to give himself up to the police in a place where there would be many witnesses (…). Vikernes claims to have escaped in the mountains only because he by chance spotted the armed men before they spotted him. Vikernes was himself unarmed. Odd Einar Dørum was minister of justice in Norway at the time (please Google translate the Norwegian entry: the English entry is very deficient).

-In 2002 the Norwegian government changed the law stating that prisoners with a 21 year sentence should serve only 12 years in prison to a law that stated that prisoners with a 21 year sentence should instead serve 14 years (2/3 of the full sentence). This law was in relation to Vikernes (but not in relation to several other prisoners…) made retroactive, in violation of both the Norwegian constitution and international law. When Vikernes had served 14 years the department of justice turned down his applications for a release on parole on grounds that Vikernes now had served for so long that he needed to be ‘better prepared for a life in freedom’, and that they had not been given the time to do so yet (…). So Vikernes had to serve another 2 years before he was finally released after just under 16 years in prison.

-The wardens in all the prisons Vikernes served in (when this question was discussed) and even the Norwegian secret police wanted Vikernes to be released after 12 years in prison, but politicians in Oslo still turned all his applications for a release on parole down, until the media (VG and Dagbladet) put so much pressure on them that they finally released him. According to the lawyer John Christian Elden, Vikernes was released after heated debate in Oslo, and with only one single vote tipping the scale in his favour.

-In 2008 Vikernes officially changed his name to Louis Cachet: Louis after a great uncle and Cachet being the surname of his wife. He did with help of the Norwegian secret police, who advised him to do so, and also because the name “Varg Vikernes” was very impractical in Norway at the time. Vikernes experienced that solely because of the name “Varg Vikernes” he was e. g. not allowed to order plane tickets, rent cars, order train tickets, rent a room in a hotel, open up a bank account, etc., either because the person taking to him though he was joking or more often because ‘good citizens’ didn’t want life to be easy for a person falsely declared by the media to be a “self-declared Neo-Nazi”. Vikernes still uses the name Varg Vikernes in everyday life, and only uses the name Louis Cachet when he has to (i. e. for signing things, legal documents etc.).

-Had in 2010 according to the Norwegian secret police more than 350 impersonators, pretending to be Vikernes, on Facebook alone.

-Moved in 2010 to Bretagne, later the same year to Auvergne and in 2012 to Corrèze – all in France.

-Arrested in 2013 by DCRI accused of “terrorism or conspiring to commit acts of terrorism”. False evidence was produced and presented to a judge to make him sign papers giving DCRI the right to arrest Vikernes and his wife in the most gentle way possible. No information about any children in the house was given to the judge. Nor was any information given to the judge about the fact that Vikernes’ wife was pregnant at the time. DCRI shot their front door open and smashed the window and did not even identify themselves as policemen until after they had entered their home. The evidence used as an excuse to arrest Vikernes and his wife was an e-mail address claimed by an anonymous source to be Vikernes’. Apparently a copy of Mr. Breivik’s manifest had been sent to this address (as if that would be a good reason to arrest even the rightful owner of the e-mail address).

The front door after DCRI had been there:

IMG_8147 IMG_8145 IMG_8143 IMG_8141

-DCRI already knew that the e-mail address used as an excuse to arrest Vikernes and his wife was not his (they have means to find such things out, fast and easily), so they were satisfied with an investigation into the matter consisting of a single question to Vikernes/his wife: “Is this your/Vikernes’ e-mail address”. Vikernes and his wife replied: “No”, and that was it (…).

-All charges for terrorism were dropped, and Vikernes and his wife were released from custody after three and two days respectively. The names of Vikernes and his wife were cleared by the police (but certainly not by the media). The police found that Vikernes and his wife had done nothing illegal whatsoever.

unnamed

-Vikernes’ wife had purchased and owned 4 hunting weapons (a .22 LR bolt-action rifle, a .22 LR lever-action rifle, one 12 Gauge side-by-side shotgun and a .223 Remington bolt-action rifle). These weapons were bought legally over a time period of several months, and not all at once or in a very short time, as claimed by most media institutions. The firearms were purchased by Vikernes’ wife, because she was in a rifle club and wanted a hunting licence to be able to hunt medium and small game later on, something she believed was important in relation to survivalism.

-Mr. Manuel Valls was at the time the head of the department responsible for the arrest.

-In 2013 politicians (and not at all the [secret] police…) tried to have Vikernes expelled from France, on grounds that he was a risk to national security. Three different judges in Brive declared that there was no reason whatsoever to expel Vikernes.

-Vikernes and his wife work in France, and pays taxes normally like others working and living in France do.

-In 2013 Vikernes had to go to court in Paris accused of “racism, Antisemitism and apology of war crimes and crimes against humanity”, but his defense lawyer was not allowed to see the ‘evidence’, made up of 900 pages of mainly print-screens, until a few days before the trial, so it was postponed until the 3rd of June 2014….

And that’s where we are now…

Banderole Procès Vikernes Mensonge d'Etat

Advertisements

Deceptive Images

MagyarSerbian.

The poisonous lies that came from Norway spread out and infected an entire sub-culture. In Norway the entire society was soaked in lies about me, but abroad only the black metal sub-culture was infected. At least initially. And all of this happened whilst I was in prison, often knowing nothing about it, always being unable to do much – if anything at all – about the little I got to know about. I was in prison anyhow, so I had other concerns. I spent 10 years on isolation, and another 6 years amongst criminals, and just trying to survive mentally was a big enough challenge. Why would I worry if some arseholes – pardon my language – pretended to be me on the outside, and said stupid things in my name? I thought people were smart enough to understand that they could not be me, and that what they said could not be true. Alas! The naivity… Alas!

The lies from Soviet Norway grew and multiplied, and they were allowed to be cultivated pretty much sans objections from me. Naturally I tried to object, when I could, but when I did I was not heard. I tried to speak up, but who would let me? The Norwegian media only wanted negative news, filth, to support their image of me as an ‘evil incarnate’. Some did let me speak, but their magazines were small and rare, and it was to little avail – and when I did try to defend myself I was ‘of course’ attacked for that too: for being an attention whore. The lies prevailed. Their fictional image of Varg Vikernes prevailed.

an-inconvenient-truth

In 2003 I received a letter from a Russian gentleman, who wanted to help me amend this situation, by making a Burzum website that was supposed to fight the lies, by concentrating all the truths on one website. That way all the lies spread by others, about me or in my name, would be at least weakened in force. It was a start, a good start, but we were fighting against all odds. What would one website be able to do against the might of the propaganda machine of Soviet Norway, and the hordes of duped metal-heads spreading their vile lies? Some of them even did it thinking they helped me by doing so!

Now, do you think that was what I wanted to spend my time on, when I finally got out of prison, in 2009? Should I spend all my time arguing on different forums, write articles and give interviews, to expose the many lies? No. I had better things to do. Trying to argue with trolls, complete idiots with no life of their own and individuals working actively to just spread lies about you is in any case useless. It most of the time will even be counter-productive.

At times though, I still spend some time trying to correct and explain – like I do here and now. It is not in my nature to accept injustice. Hopefully a day will come when the truth is appreciated, when justice will prevail, and even though nobody will care to listen today, then perhaps better men will listen in the future: dig up old information and find the truth, under the many layers of lies.

As you can understand, I say this now because next week I will go to court in Paris, the 3rd of June, at 13:00, and I risk not only the lies of the prosecutor, ordered by certain politicians in France to present false evidence against me in order to harm me as much as possible, but also the lies of the propagandists of the mainstream media. I know that some of them are aware of the injustice I am being exposed to when I am charged with “racism, anti-Semitism and apology for war crimes and crimes against humanity”. I know that some few of them are there to tell the truth, and I hope that many – or even most – of them will do the same, but wise from harm, I have no expectations, and I wish to warn you in advance, of what might come.

The wind is turning though, the enemies of Europe are losing the battle, and more and more Europeans, even journalists and editors of mainstream media, have started to at least try to do the right thing – to stop letting small groups of ruthless anti-European gangsters dictate what and how they are going to report.

Europe has a proud history of justice, only interrupted for short periods of time every now and then, by periods of injustice – coming from the ‘head’, but never reaching all the way down to the ‘toes’. We are in one such period of injustice, it is mostly at the ‘head’ level and we are at the end of it – and we are because the injustic is so extreme and so random, it is harming Europe and Europeans so much, and it is so massive that it beomes harder and harder for ordinary Europeans not to see it – as clear and bright as the blue sky itself. The good thing then, when individuals like me are being viciously attacked by politicians who hate Europe and everything European and whose loyalty lies elsewhere (quand même!), is that it becomes so clear and so obvious that we need a change: we need to return to and embrace Justice!

Fellow Europeans, good men and women, gentlemen and ladies, journalists and editors; no matter what happens to me the 3rd of June, use it for all it is worth to disarm the enemies of Justice – the enemies of everything European.

Hail Justice! Hail Europe! 

puppets

 

Varg who?

FrenchMagyarSerbian.

From 1993 and until this very day I have had a problem with the Norwegian media and even the Norwegian educational system, who systematically, consequently and intentionally spread lies about me, to undermine me as a dissident voice. So even today the most common perception of me in Norway is that I am just some retarded lunatic, a ‘satanist’ and a ‘neo-nazi’, with serious mental problems. As late as last year they had a psychologist say in the media (Aftenposten) that I would have been given a diagnosis, had I been examined today. It is indeed interesting to see that a psychologist I have never spoken to thinks he can tell that I need a diagnosis, when psychiatrists, and not at all psychologists, are the ones who normally diagnose people (after talking to them personally). Well: apparently it is not so in Norway, and certainly not in relation to me!

e1c5a8651b40c2fcb858cf4e4fa5b70c8b038fbac496ebc60a057e14f4bb8c6e

We know well the tactic of giving diagnoses to dissidents, from the Soviet Union, Communist China, North Korea, DDR and other totalitarian regimes, and this is done to undermine them and basically destroy their credibility. Yes: Norway is no different from these regimes in that context! This should not be surprising though, considering that a fair number of the politicians, journalists, reporters, lecturers and teachers in Norway were Marxists, Maoists, Enver Hoxha fans and Pol Pot-supporters in the 70ies, and many even consciously worked as agents for the Soviet Union or – more commonly – DDR. When the Cold War ended the former Warsaw Pact countries changed, but ‘Soviet Norway’ was on the winning NATO side, so it mostly remained a horribly oppressive, socialist extremist system. The one single state-controlled TV station was given controlled competition (Yes! We had one single state controlled TV station in Norway until 1991!), and the few state-controlled radio stations too, but by and large the totalitarian system remained – supported by the USA and NATO. The petroleum industry alone ensured Norway’s economic survival – and much of the ‘oil wealth’ was and still is used to create a false image of Norway abroad, and even to bribe others to talk warmly about Norway: “the best country to live in in the world”, no doubt.

Parts of the extremists in power in Norway also try to ignore me though, to pretend that I don’t exist, to erase me from the history of Norway. The official Norwegian online encyclopedia for example does its best to do just that: I am only mentioned once, and only in context with Mayhem – and of course without mentioning my real name… they just call me Kristian Vikernes. Varg Vikernes never existed, according to them… “Varg who? Never heard of him.”

A journalist who reviewed “Belus” in 2009, and was rude enough to say he liked it, had to defend having done so in several radio interviews. According to another journalist, the leaders of the mass media institutions in Norway have agreed upon not to review any more of my albums. I am not to be described in a positive way, and thus to describe me as a creative musician is a big no no. If they are to mention me, it is only to be done in a negative way: as a terrorist suspect, a ‘satanist’, a ‘neo-nazi’, a murderer, a church burner, and not least: as a person who should have been given a diagnosis…

Ah! So they do know who Varg is after all then, and they know well who I am. *Phew* I almost thought I was imagining my own existence there for a moment…

dont-think

Will this never change? Will they continue to ignore me or spread lies about me in Norway? Well, I honestly believe that things will change. Even in Norway, the most totalitarian state in all of Europe, information seeps in, the truth prevails, slowly, but surely. Now, don’t get me wrong: the information itself flows freely, we have the Internet now, but the truth is struggling to get through the truth-filters that most people today, and in particular Norwegians, have been equipped with – by the educational system and the entertainment industry, by the system itself. They are taught that up is down, and down is up, so they struggle to see the truth even when it hits them in the face, so to speak, but like I said: the truth seeps in, slowly, but surely. With time they will open their eyes, and after some time of feeling only shame, for having been so easily duped, they will grow angry – and when they do they will demand a change. 

lemmings-at-the-cliff

Der Process

French. MagyarRomanianSerbian. Spanish.

Last year individuals in the government of France, without permission from a judge, had their police shoot up our front door in the early morning (rather than just knock on the door). They did not identify themselves as policemen until after they have breached the door and entered, but thankfully I could see through the glass that they were indeed policemen. (We can only speculate on why they did it that way.) They arrested my pregnant wife and me, and left our scared children – age 2, 3 and 5 at the time – to the care of my boomer parents-in-law, who (according to the children) instead of comforting them hit the oldest one and told them all that they would not see us again.

The police arrested us without having any evidence against us, and without a judge’s permission to do so. We were not charged with anything, and the evidence they had been told by politicians to use as an excuse to arrest us was proven beyond all doubt to be absolute nonsense – and the police knew that it was even before they arrested us. In the meanwhile, the media presented us as Neo-Nazis and terrorists with links to the Zionist terrorist Anders Breivik. They did because they had been told to do so, by the same politicians who had ordered our illegal arrest in the first place.

Our home after the arrest:

IMG_8147 IMG_8145 IMG_8143 IMG_8141 IMG_8139

When we were released from custody, cleared of all suspicions, the media were told by the same politicians not to talk more about our case, and most didn’t either. So the image of us as Neo-Nazis and terror suspects remained in large parts of the French public…

Shortly after the release from custody, my wife and I got our children back, in spite of my parents-in-law, who wrote a letter to a judge and tried to take our children from us. They wanted to keep them, to spare them of the ‘evil Nazi’ influence of their parents and to send them to public school (we home-school our children, something they obviously don’t approve of). The judge naturally ruled in our favour, and our children were allowed to return home after one week away from us.

After our release the bank closed our account without any explanation, and then an online bank service closed our account, again without any explanation, and banned us forever. Then the same politicians who had ordered our arrest to start with tried to have me expelled from France, on grounds of me being “a threat to national security”. The judges, again, ruled in my favour. Finally the politicians decided to have me charged with (I am not kidding): “apology for war crimes and crimes against humanity”, “anti-Semitism” and “racism”, because of my posts here on Thulean Perspective. They held back the ‘evidence’ against me, some 900 pages of information, until a few days before the trial, so my lawyer asked for the case to be postponed, on grounds that he had not been given the opportunity to prepare my defence. The judges agreed, and postponed the case to the 3rd of June this year.

So the process continues, and I risk up to 5 years in prison, because of things I supposedly have published here on Thulean Perspective. Yes; up to 5 years in prison in France for writing on a blog…. in English, on a server in the USA.

This is the status of Europe today: the so-called ‘democracies’ are in reality dictatorships, where those in power can do whatever they want to , without consequence. Yes, on paper we could have sued the politicians responsible for our illegal arrest, but they prevent that from ever happening by continously persecuting us or having others persecute us. They are thus draining our ecomony, leaving us without the means to sue them. Having boomer parents-in-laws, who jumped on the opportunty to punish their daughter for having married me, by trying to take our children from us (probably to use them as hostages, to force my wife to divorce me), naturally didn’t help either. The trial the 3rd of June thus makes sense: they want to make sure that I will never be able to sue them. You see, I need a lawyer for my defence, and lawyers are very expensive. They don’t need a conviction to win: they ruin my ability to sue them no matter what. It’s a win-win situation for them.

So why were we arrested in the first place, when we had done nothing wrong? The answer is simple: they don’t want anybody to speak up against them and their lunatic agenda. I promote European culture, by advocating good European ideals, values, traditions and ideas, and they don’t want me to. Nor do they want any others to do so, and nobody wants to have their doors shot up, something the authorities are apparently willing to do even with pregnant wives and small children inside, and even when there is no evidence whatsoever of any criminal activity by whoever is inside… In other words: it’s psychological warfare. They scare people into silence, by terrorizing me and my family. They make people not want to promote our own Pagan culture, and thus make it easier for them to replace it.

Why do they want to replace our culture? Well; you ask them…

My friends at Scriptoblog have written a post about this case, with a link to a Facebook support account, encouraging people to show up in Paris the 3rd of June, around 13:00, to support me and my family against the terror of politicians in the government in France. I hope to see many of you there. Show individuals in the government that we don’t tolerate their behaviour, and that we are not afraid!

 

Red Hair

Serbian.

Every now and then I get mails or comments from people who claim that red-haired individuals are more European and more racially pure than other Europeans. They have the fairest skin, they argue, so they must be the most ‘racially pure’. This fallacy seems to be very widespread, so I will spend some time telling you what red hair really is all about.

It is quite simple really; those with red hair have very little brown melanin (that turns the skin brown, especially when exposed to Sunlight), but they have much red melanin (that turns the skin red, especially when exposed to Sunlight) – compared to blondes who have very little brown and very little red melanin. So even though the red haired people are very pale, they have much more melanin than blondes do.

This means that red haired individuals don’t tan very well and instead they burn their skin when exposed to Sunlight – and get very red skin as a result (the red melanin). So they don’t handle Sunlight or heat in general very well (but on the positive side red haired individuals seems to be more resistant to poison [alcohol] than others and also to pain).

We don’t really know when the first individuals with red hair appeared, but we know it is a mutation that occurred when Europeans (with very little melanin) mixed with non-Europeans (with much melanin) a long time ago. As you might already know ‘mutations’ occur when species and sub-species mix mainly, and the mutation causing red hair and very pale/red skin was no different. This mixing of species created a mutation that left individuals with much melanin (a non-European feature), but with only much red melanin – as explained above. As a result of this these individuals got red hair and very pale skin that turns red when exposed to sunlight, and also freckles.

So to sum it up; the red haired individuals have inherited a set of genes resulting from a mutation that was caused by mixing, and they are not “purer” than others.

With that said though: the individuals with red hair are not less pure than most other Europeans either, they just have inherited this particular set of genes, that were caused by a mutation resulting from the mixing of species. Other Europeans may have other non-European features or other mutations caused by the same mixing of species, such as brown hair (all purely non-Europeans have black hair [and some Europeans have inherited that trait too]), brown or hazel eyes, olive skin, low IQ, laziness, a weakened skeleton (compared to the powerful European skeleton), loss of muscle volume, etc. etc.. Many Europeans have other ‘defects’ too, caused by the same mixing of species, such as hypersexuality, extreme growth, autoimmune system problems, nerve problems (like MS), metabolism issues, brain damages and so forth, all caused by the mixing of species long, long ago…

If you want a rule of thumb though, you can be sure that the more blonde, blue-eyed, intelligent, courageous, strong, creative and beautiful (=healthy) a European is, the more likely it is that he is indeed as racially pure as is possible today.

Red hair is common in non-European peoples too, in particular the Jews, because these peoples are extremely mongrelized (obviously for geographical reasons: the Jews lived where the species from three continents met) and thus suffer from so many of the effects of mixing, including red hair.

I can add that Scandinavians, the most racially pure tribes in Europe, actually normally tan very well, and this is because they are so racially pure: their fair skin is very good at producing “Sunshine vitamins” even when exposed to very little Sunlight, so when exposed to much Sunlight the skin tans very quickly, because they don’t need the skin ‘to use the opportunity’ to produce that much Sunshine vitamins – instead the sensitive fair skin needs to protect itself from too much exposure to Sunlight. Red haired individuals try to do the same, but has so much red melanin that they fail to do so, and thus Sunburn instead and turn red.

Europe today is a colourful species (yes: Europe is a biological term too, a species), but these features are just on the surface. What matters more is what is inside each European man, in terms of intelligence, courage, general health and the will to make sacrifices for causes greater than themselves. HailaR WôðanaR!

Some beautiful ‘Europeans of many colours’:

images (6)ukrainepagansred-headed-woman

PS. We don’t really know exactly why there is so much red hair in the British isles, but the most probably explanation to this is that the tribes who moved there happened to have many individuals with red hair, and these features thus became very common. Another possible explanation is that the tribes living there (the Welsh, the Irish [including the Scots], the Picts and the Britons) actually partly came from Egypt, a place that at the time (naturally because of the location) was more mixed than the rest of Europe (as a biological term), and that they are in fact the descendants of the last European nobles living there. They in a sense abandoned ‘the sinking Egyptian ship’ before it was too late for them, and went to the British Isles, and were assimilated in the European tribes already living there – leaving behind a mongrel Egypt (the last few dynasties) in decline. There is no proof of this, but there apparently is some evidence suggesting that this is actually what happened. This ‘Egyptian hypothesis’ would also explain why there is so much dark hair and brown eyes in the native tribes of the British isles.

The Fall of Man, part III

Francais. Serbian. Spanish.

Domesticated animals are broken creatures, as explained here, but agriculture has had an interesting effect on man too: the man domesticating animals has himself become domesticated. Modern human beings are cramped together in unnatural environments, in ‘cages’ in towns, where man had to invent sewers just to get rid of all the accumulating human manure resulting from this unnatural lifestyle. Today man has become so domesticated that the adults no longer raise their own children, but instead send them to be ‘trained’ for their future slave tasks in kindergartens, in schools, at universities, by TV, radio and other ‘entertainment’ and so forth – just like we train animals for certain tasks too. Their offspring is vaccinated and in effect taken away from them most of the time to be further domesticated. “Trained” like we train dogs, only for more complex tasks. 

Man has been trapped in this vicious circle since the introduction of agriculture, and unless man can free himself from this there is no other end to it than the end of man himself. Just like the animals we domesticated we will become (even more) broken and unable to survive on our own, and then simply die out… the quality of mankind has already dropped dramatically over the years, and at one point we will be so weak that we can not survive without medicines, vitamin injections and you name it, and then one day something happens that was not supposed to happen, and e. g. the medicines run out or fail to arrive where they should, and that will be the end of mankind.

Mongrelized, disabled, handicapped, weak, stupid and feeble, will man disappear from the face of the Earth.

(Good riddance… )

The Fall of Man, part II

Francais. Serbian. Spanish.

About 10,000 years ago man started to cultivate the land as well. Mankind all of a sudden became more numerous, and probably for the first time in the history of man famine, tyranny, slavery and malnutrition became a reality. Famine because the crops failed from time to time. Tyranny because someone owned the land and decided who was to eat and who was not to1. Slavery because tyrants could make use of humans as ‘cattle’ workers. Malnutrition because settled men had a less varied diet.

1The word “Lord” (“l[ev]ord”, from Norse hleif-vörðr, from proto-Nordic hlaiba-wardaR, from PIO klaiba-wardas) even originally means “guardian of bread”.

But why did they start to cultivate the land?

Because it was easier and less exhausting than to collect wild berries and other eatable growths?

Well, the spread of agriculture in Europe did not come because of “progress” brought about by the lazy and weak mongrelized man – as was the case for domestication of animals. The European knew well how to cultivate the land before 10,000 years ago too, but he only did so when he had to, and he usually only had to when there was not enough room for the hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Domestication of animals had caused an explosion in the human population, and when these human beings spread out they forced more and more Europeans to turn to domestication and agriculture to survive. Even if they were smart enough to see the adverse effects of this they no longer had any choice: they had to drop their healthy and harmonic hunter-gatherer lifestyle in favour of agriculture. There were too many human beings by then….  

The Fall of Man, part I

Francais. Serbian. Spanish.

Let me hold unto this music for some time…

About 12,000 years ago man started to domesticate animals. Mankind all of a sudden became more numerous, and probably for the first time in the history of man diseases started to spread from animal to man. The domestication created a new and unnatural relationship between animal and man.

Altamira,_bison

In this situation the animals changed too. As stated here creatures of different species or sub-species don’t mix in nature, if they have a choice, because of their genetic differences, but also because of their different lifestyles and their geographical locations. Domesticated animals were forced to procreate with animals they otherwise would not have procreated with, because they had to or because they were forced to by man, who wanted to promote certain qualities in their animals.

With time the domesticated creatures became broken, unable to survive on their own, and they were thus completely dependent of their human masters, often in order to even survive. E. g. milk cows today produce a lot of milk, but they will soon die from teat infection unless they are milked every single day – because they produce too much.

But why did they start to domesticate animals?

Because it was easier and less exhausting than to hunt wild animals.

But why did man all of a sudden want to take the easier path some 12,000 years ago? He was no less intelligent even 400,000 years ago, so why this development at that point?

Because the native European man, the Neanderthal, had been a little bit mixed with Africans, Homo Sapiens, and the adverse effects of this mixing were many: loss of speed and muscle-mass, the weakening of the skeleton and a lowering of intelligence. Hunting became more difficult for the “new” and mixed European (the Cro-Magnon). Also, this “new” European was less intelligent than the old European, so he didn’t understand that domesticating animals could have such dramatic and adverse effects.

We have “progress” today too, because we are intelligent. So we e. g. invented pesticides, and by doing so got rid of a lot of the problems we had in agriculture. Today we try to reduce the use of pesticides though, because we understand that they actually do more harm than they do good. I say this, to make you understand that had we been more intelligent than we are today, we would probably not have invented pesticides or used them, because we would have understood that doing so is actually not at all good. The Neanderthals might have not domesticated animals because they were intelligent enough to understand that doing so was not very smart. The mixed Neanderthal though was not that smart….

So the with time dumber and dumber mixed race human beings finally ended up thinking that it would be a good idea to domesticate animals, and they eventually were dumb enough to think this was a good idea around 12,000 years ago.

So why were the Neanderthals dumb enough to mix with Homo Sapiens? We don’t know, but the most likely explanation to this is simply pity. The much stronger and much more intelligent Neanderthals defeated the tribes of Homo Sapiens attacking them in Africa, but they were good at heart, like Europeans still are, so they could not kill the African babies, or leave them there to die, when they had killed or chased away the African adults. So they adopted these babies, probably knowing it was not such a good idea, and every now and then some of these adopted children grew up and was allowed to procreate with a Neanderthal. The female offspring they had was fertile… (as is often the case when two different species mix). Over the course of 120,000 years of conflict in Africa, between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens, some Homo Sapiens blood was mixed into the Neanderthal tribes, who brought this female African DNA with them back to Europe when the Ice Age ended. And because of this we – Europeans – have on average 0,3% purely African DNA.

The mixing of species or even sub-species is never a good idea. It left much of the European species if not broken, then at least dramatically reduced in quality, and with time this reduction in quality spread out all across Europe.

The last to fall to this racial decline was the Western and Northern European tribes, simply because they lived furthest away from the source of the problem; the land connection between Asia and Africa… 

The Bone Flute

ItalianoMagyarRussian. Serbian. Spanish.

European dolmens investigated in the 19th century unveiled remains of men with skulls slightly different from the skulls of modern man. The skulls often looked more like Neanderthal skulls.

Why?

Because they were racially very pure Europeans, and thus often still had these very clear adult Neanderthal skull features. Like racially very pure Europeans today still have all the other very clear Neanderthal features – including the child Neanderthal skull features.

Those who found these skulls were men of the church though, priests in black robes serving a Jewish faith, so they covered this up and mentioned it no more…

The Neanderthal man still finally reached the public attention. Not the ones found in dolmens from only a few millenniums BC, but the much older remains. Again it was priests of the Judaic faith who controlled the flow of information, and they presented their own interpretations to the public. The proto-European man thus ended up being presented like this:

images

In reality the Neanderthal man existed well into historical time and actually looked more like this:

2-romes-enemies-ii-gallic-and-british-celts[1].preview

After some time science took over, and man became so much more enlightened. Ah, those foolish religious people didn’t know any better, but now man did! Aye! Scientists investigated the matter, and…

Well, they actually came to the exact same conclusions as the men of the Church had: God’s Creation was just replaced with “The Big Bang” and “The 7 days of Creation” was replaced with “evolution”.

However, the scientists were much more successful in spreading their propaganda, and just like people before had blindly believed in their priests man now instead blindly believed in their scientists. “It has been scientifically proven!” They said.

The Neanderthal man, who actually looked more like this:

reA reD reC reB

Was (still) presented like this:

images

Why?

Because had he not still looked like that it would have come into conflict with their new version of Christianity: “science”.

Whenever archaeological evidence shows up disproving their lies they either cover them up, destroy the evidence or ignore it. So if you find this bone in Europe after the African Homo Sapiens are supposed to have come to Europe then it is “ a flute”:

bone-fl nearnderflute

If you however find out that this bone is older than that, and actually stem from the Neanderthal Europe then it is just a bone gnawed upon by animals.

Why?

Because it has to be like that for their evolution theory to hold any water.

You might understand by now that their theory of evolution actually doesn’t hold water, but don’t you dare say that in public! If you do you are a Creationist and your perception will be called “religious”. You are thus just an ignorant fool in conflict with science and scientifically proven facts. In other words you are laughable! Ha ha ha! What a fool!

Science has spoken…

This bone flute is according to science not the work of Neanderthal man, but the result of animals gnawing on the bone. Ok, animals don’t actually make holes like that in bones; they crush the bones instead to get to the marrrow, but this time an animal did. Just like with the evolution theory, stating that it is 0,000000000000000000000001% chance that a frog will develop feathered wings and then start to fly, and then make this an advantage somehow, there is at least a 0,000000000000000000000001% chance that an animal gnawing on a bone makes holes like that, perfectly aligned in a scale making it by chance into an instrument, and also at least a 0,000000000000000000000001% chance that this particular bone survived and was found by modern man… so statistically there is a chance that this happened – and obviously it did (…). The chances that this is the case is of course so much more likely than the absurd notion that the Neanderthals made this flute. Why would they? They were primitive animal-like brutes, weren’t they? Sure, they had a bigger brain and everything, but their brain was different from our brain, so this doesn’t matter…

Right…

NB! Statistically it is also perfectly possible to roll a 6 on a dice 10,000 in a row, but even though it is statistically possible it will never happen. Not even a 1,000 or a 100 times in a row.

Before we continue you can enjoy modern music played on “a bone gnawed upon by animals” (i. e. a flute made by proto-Europeans [Neanderthals]) between 43,000 and 60,000 years ago:

Much of the scientific work is good and valuable, but whenever the scientific work comes into conflict with the dogmas of Judeo-Christianity it is placed under “control” by those in power. No scientific work is allowed to unveil the truth in relation to history, pre-history or indeed in relation to the races of men.

Science today is very dangerous, because it is presented as a real alternative to the religious nonsense of Judeo-Christianity, but in reality it is only allowed to be the exact same only with a different facade. It is only allowed to support the dogmas of Judeo-Christianity! The scientist is in practice just a priest dressed up differently.

The true Face of modern Science:

ephod

What makes modern science so dangerous is that while all people with a three digit IQ ignores the nonsense of Judeo-Christianity, almost everybody blindly believes in whatever the scientists tell them (and they tell them exactly the same as the Judeo-Christian religions, only with different words!). If it is science it has to be true! So science is being actively used by the Judeo-Christian people in power to manipulate the people and control their minds.

Whenever you see a scientific result supporting anything those in power says about history, pre-history or the races of men you can be sure it is a lie! The truth is that man was better before, and that everything in our world has degenerated since the introduction of Judeo-Christianity. Everything is going down the drain! Man is getting dumber, weaker, uglier and more racially mixed as time passes by, because this is what the Judeo-Christians in power want; they need man to be like that for them to gain total control and fullfil their dream of a J*****-controlled World Government. The rest of us, the non-J****, are to be just cattle to them, but we are not, so they have to turn us into cattle, and they do… and they have done that for 2000 years now.

Modern “science” is a means for them to achieve this.

There was actually no “pre-history”; we knew our history before. We had everything recorded, but the Judeo-Christians burned our records and also those who knew this history. They banned the truth and with time our history became erased from the memory of man. We knew. We remembered.

Our modern history suffers a similar fate, when their medias twist the truth and tell us only lies about what is really going on in our world, as we speak. E. g. their actions to prevent Gadaffi from forcing them to pay for oil with gold, using CIA- and Mossad-trained foreign mercenaries to attack the Libyan regime, was presented to us as a “popular uprising”. The only country in Africa with a welfare system, a popular and loved leader and no debt became just another slave-colony for their banks.

It is funny how “hated dictators” can ride in open cars like this, being cheered on by their peoples, while American “elected” presidents need to travel in armoured cars in secret:

History as told to us by our rulers is a lie! Never forget that!

We are still Neanderthals! HailaR WôðanaR!

The Longing

Italiano. MagyarРусский.

First some appropriate music.

As some of you might understand I miss Norway. Not today’s Norway. Not even the Norway I grew up in. I miss the Norway that used to be, long before I was born.

How can I miss something I never knew, you say? Well, what makes you think I didn’t know Ancient Norway? I was there, and the memory is stored in my blood and my spirit. My forebears for thousands of years were all Scandinavians.

Yes, I miss Ancient Denmark as well, and Ancient Sweden. I was there too. I have not only Norwegian, but also Danish and Swedish forebears. Scandinavia (*Skanþin-awjo; “Skanþe’s land by the sea”) is my homeland, my cradle, my hope, my love and my pride. My grave too, I hope.

Scandinavia and the Europe she is a part of is the only motivation I have for my vocal attacks on internationalism and the depraved internationalists. I hate nobody. I only love what is my own, and when necessary at the expense of what is not.

If I ever come across as aggressive and impolite, as ruthless and perhaps even cruel, you now know why. Bear with me; I fight for the roots of the tree that nourish me and keep me alive.

Thank you for the attention.

HailaR Skanþe! 

vikingwarrior